dear readers, WITH THIS I WANT TO mention to  YOU THAT I STUDIED THE RTE ACT 2010 IN DETAILS AND FOUND NOTHING NEW IN IT THat AIMPLB SHOULD REACT ABOUT. THE RULES OF RECOGNITION OF SCHOOL AND PROHIBITION OF RUNNING SCHOOL WITHOUT RECOGNITION ARE ALREADY LAW AND RULE OF THE STATES SINCE DECADES CARRYING SAME MEANING IN LETTER AND SPIRIT AS THAT IS NOW MENTIONED IN RTE ACT. IT SHALL ONLY ATTRACT US WHEN WE TRY GETTING RECOGNITION OR OTHERWISE FOLLOW THEIR CURRICULUM AND REFUSE TO GET RECOGNIZED. AS BEFORE, NO ONE CAN PROSECUTE YOU IF YOU TEACH QURAAN AND HADITH AND DONT SEEK THEIR RECOGNITION UNLESS YOU YOURSELF POINT OUT, "THIS BECOMES AGAINST YOUR LAW!".REST OF THE OBJECTIONS TAKEN BY M.WALI REHMANI ARE DEBATABLE BY EDUCATIONISTS AND BEAR NO SPECIFIC RELEVANCE TO MUSLIMS AS SUCH. M.A.RAHIM QURESHI'S COMMENTS NEED NO MERIT. UNSTUDIED STATMENT AS USUAL. BETTER THE MATTER WAS REFERRED TO LAW COMMITTEE BEFORE MAKING AN ISSUE OUT OF NON-ISSUE  WASTING VALUABLE TIME.